Anastomotic fistula after emergency enterectomy for retrograde intussusception after gastric bypass
- 1 Department of General Surgery, Centro Hospitalar e Universitario de Coimbra EPE, Coimbra, Portugal
- 2 Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
- Correspondence to Dr Andre Lazaro; andrelazaro@gmail.com
Abstract
Retrograde intussusception is a rare complication of gastric bypass. It is commonly located in the common limb close to the jejunojejunostomy. The management of such condition dictates the outcome of the patient either in the immediate emergency setting or in the long-term bariatric surgery’s expected results. We present a case of a retrograde intussusception 3 years after gastric bypass which warranted an emergency enterectomy, followed by an anastomotic fistula. The adequate management of these cases leads to recovery without compromising the effect of bariatric surgery in the future.
Background
Small bowel intussusception is more commonly seen in children.1 2 In adult life, it is usually associated with pre-existent small bowel pathology like polyps, lipoma or neoplasms. In obesity surgery, mainly after gastric bypass, intussusception is a rare condition that might cause either recurrent mild symptoms that pose a diagnostic problem or an urgent condition requiring emergency surgery.3–6 When small bowel resection is mandatory it might prove a challenge to avoid short bowel syndrome without compromising future weight gain and consequent recurrent obesity.
Case presentation
A 36-year-old female patient with a history of a laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass 3 years earlier was admitted to the emergency room with severe abdominal pain. Prior metabolic comorbidities were: sleep apnoea, dyslipidaemia, arterial hypertension and steatosis. Currently experiencing no comorbidities with regular follow-up and normal blood tests under supplementation with folic acid and iron.
The patient weight before surgery was 106 kg with a body mass index of 44,69 kg/m2. Follow-up evaluation revealed a weight of 64.3 kg and 61 kg, respectively, 1 and 3 years after surgery. Percentage of EWL (Excess weight loss) at 1 year was 89.3% and at 3 years was 95.3%, respectively.
Investigations
Emergency room patient examination revealed a distended and tender abdomen and blood tests showed 12.2 x109/L leucocytosis with neutrophilia. An abdominal CT scan was performed showing a Roux-limb retrograde intussusception with pneumatosis and reduced bowel wall enhancement (figure 1). An emergent laparotomy was performed through a midline incision. After identifying the intussusception which was located around 20 cm distally to the jejunojejunal anastomosis, it was manually reduced revealing an intestinal perforation of the hidden segment (figure 2). Around 30 cm of small bowel was resected and a side-to-side stapled anastomosis was performed. On the fifth postoperative day, patient status deteriorated, with increasing abdominal pain and laboratorial work-up revealed an elevated C reactive protein of 14 mg/dL and 8.5 x109/L leucocytes. Wound infection was present with enteric fluid drainage. A CT scan revealed pneumoperitoneum and an enterocutaneous fistula (figure 3). These findings prompted a surgical revision. Access to the abdominal cavity was done through the previous midline incision, revealing a small perforation around 4 cm proximally to the recently performed anastomosis and 4 cm distally to the Roux limb emergence (figure 4). All small bowel was then measured to allow for a better decision making. The alimentary limb’s length was 130 cm, the biliopancreatic limb was 60 cm and the common limb was 270 cm.
CT scan showing bowel intussusception, pneumatosis and reduced bowel wall enhancement.
Perforation and mucosa necrosis.
CT scan showing pneumoperitoneum and enterocutaneous fistula.
Fistula.
Treatment
Unable to safely perform a new anastomosis without compromising either of the previous anastomosed segments’ blood supply (original Roux limb anastomosis and intussusception anastomosis) the surgical team decided to resect these two previous anastomosis. After resection, three separate jejunal segments were left (alimentary, biliopancreatic and common limbs) (figure 5). The resected portion measured 30×10 cm taking into account recent follow-up evaluation with no vitamins or iron deficiency and the patient’s haemodinamical stability and circumscribed sepsis, the surgical team’s decision was to perform a double side-to-side manual anastomosis with a two layered 2–0 poliglactin suture. The main decision in performing both anastomosis was to prevent one or several jejunostomies and iterative surgical procedures. However, a very important decision had to be made regarding the placement of both anastomosis. In order to prevent postoperative short bowel syndrome, the biliopancreatic limb was anastomosed 40 cm proximally in the alimentary limb, performing the following anastomosis at the end of this segment. In this way, the final layout of the small bowel was as follows: alimentary limb 80 cm, biliopancreatic limb 50 cm and common limb 290 cm (figure 6).
Three limb layout after resection (alimentary on the patient’s top right flank, biliary on the patient’s left flank and Roux limb right flank below).
Final layout of the double anastomosis.
Outcome and follow-up
On the first postoperative day, the patient ensued an acute respiratory distress syndrome, managed with non-invasive ventilation. Due to this event, the patient was put on intravenous nutrition and oral intake was only resumed on day 8. A superficial wound infection was managed with daily dressings. The patient was discharged home on postoperative day 18. Discharge medication included low-molecular-weight heparin, vitamins and iron supplementation. The patient was evaluated on a follow-up appointment at day 30 after discharge. No further complications were identified and patient’s weight was 58 kg (103% excess weight loss (EWL)). Last recorded weight before this event was 61.5 kg 1 month earlier. All lab tests were normal including haemoglobin, vitamins and ferritin.
Discussion
Management of retrograde intussusception usually requires emergency surgery. The surgical approach might be through minimal invasive or open surgery depending on the clinical presentation and surgeon’s experience.7–9 Decision for enterectomy must take into account not only immediate and uneventful patient recovery but also potential interference with the long-term results of the primary bariatric procedure.
Our surgical team believes this postoperative fistula was due to a microvascular perfusion defect/ischaemia associated with enhanced bowel wall pressure caused by the intussusception.
An important decision to make in the operating room would be to decide either performing a feeding gastrostomy using the excluded stomach or a common limb feeding jejunostomy.
A feeding gastrostomy using the excluded stomach would be potentially hazardous since it would be placed proximally to the performed double anastomosis.
Common limb jejunostomy was avoided by the added risk of potential complications that might lead to a short bowel syndrome.
It is therefore of utmost importance to decide whether it is feasible to further reduce Roux limb length enhancing malabsorption or, on the other hand, to promote a longer Roux limb, avoiding a short-bowel syndrome but potentially inducing weight regain in the near future. In our experience with this case, promoting a longer Roux limb was mandatory since there had been already a previous resection, thus preventing a short-bowel syndrome and a difficult management of future malabsorption. Interference with patient weight was minimal and there was no worsening of patient’s vitamins, haemoglobin and ferritin levels.
Late postoperative intussusception is rare in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and needs a careful intraoperative decision making, essential for providing the best possible outcome for the patient. In the presented case, intussusception required resection and the postoperative anastomotic fistula proved a real challenge in the final decision for two anastomosis. The main highlight of this case is that a careful decision making allowed for a correct fistula management while preserving obesity surgery outcomes. The result was full recovery with no additional major complications, maintaining a successful management of the patient’s obesity.
Patient’s perspective
I am very pleased with the overall result of the particular management of my clinical situation since I was perfectly aware how severely ill I was and how the decision-making strategies provided the best possible outcome. I am also satisfied with the weight maintenance revealing an important factor of the decision making which was the long-term weight control.
Learning points
-
Early diagnosis of fistula proved to very useful in the management of the abdominal sepsis.
-
Critical operating room decision making had to take into account not only the immediate life-threatening situation but also the long-term management of obesity surgery outcomes.
-
Important decision in final anastomotic layout had to be made to ensure absence of postoperative short bowel syndrome.
-
Safe postoperative course with no major complications and good overall result in the long term helped to highlight the importance of the presented case.
Footnotes
-
Contributors AL contributed by designing, planning, conception, conducting, reporting, data analysis and interpretation. JS contributed by conducting, reporting, data acquisition and analysis. AVdC contributed by conducting, reporting and data acquisition. LV contributed by conducting, reporting and data acquisition.
-
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
-
Competing interests None declared.
-
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
- © BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
References
Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer